Action Alert: Attacking Iran Should be off the Table

Attacking Iran should be 'off the table'

The 2008 presidential candidates need to know that attacking Iran is not an option.

Iran stopped its nuclear weapons program in 2003. That's according to 16 different U.S. spy agencies, in the National Intelligence Estimate released earlier this week.1

Over the last couple of months, we've seen one presidential candidate after the other say that 'all options are on the table' when it comes to Iran. Now we know that there is clearly no justification for an attack. It's time to put an end to the dangerous saber-rattling that's going on and ask that all the 2008 presidential hopefuls who have taken the 'all options' position take it back. Let them know how you feel by adding your name to our 'Take It Back' petition.

Tell the campaigns to take it back.

http://act.truemajorityaction.org/t/61/petition.jsp?petition_KEY=29

We've compiled a list of all the presidential hopefuls who have said that the option of attacking Iran should be left on the table. Starting another war in the Middle East with Iran would be nuts. And now we know it would be unjustifiably nuts. We'll be sending all the signatures we collect to the campaigns involved and we'll be sure to let you know what they say. Add your name today.

Peace,

Darcy Scott Martin
TrueMajorityAction.org Washington Director

1. "The Fallout from the Iran Nukes Report," Time, December 3, 2007