Week 2- Progressive Christianity and Immigration- Ian Lawton

I come to this issue as a legal immigrant in this country.

Let me describe to you the immigration process as my family has experienced it. We arrived with temporary visas. It took two years to gain permanent, legal status or a Green Card. After this long, difficult and expensive process, we are now described as “legal resident aliens.”

Even the fact that it is called alien is significant in this regard. Our experience in this country, and we come from Australia which is so similar, we come with the English language, with the support of a large community, with the benefit of lawyers who have helped the process along, is that it is a tough process.

How hard must it be for someone without English as a first language, without support structures, coming from a completely different culture, to arrive and deal with the legal and administrative challenges, not to mention the human challenge of adjusting to a new culture?

You might expect that legal immigrants have all the same legal rights as naturalized citizens, but in fact that is not true. As a legal immigrant, I cannot vote, either locally or nationally, and that is a huge issue. The second issue is that I don’t have access to all jobs in this country. I can enlist in the military, but cannot serve in the police force or fire brigade. I could be a Senator, Congress Person, even Governor of a State, but not the Vice President or President of the country. Where’s the logic in that?

I can’t sponsor other family members to come to this country so that they might also be legal immigrants. For many years I won’t have access to all the social benefits of this country’s government structures.

But then, maybe the most significant of all is that if a legal immigrant commits a crime, even a non violent misdemeanor, not only do they serve the time and the penalty in this country, but when they finish serving time, they could very well be deported. A law that came in the 1990’s has put into law the reality that many people, half a million people in the last ten years, have been deported after serving their time for a crime in this country, many of which were minor crimes.

There is one case of a man from Haiti who immigrated in 1970 to America. He enlisted in the military, served four years in the Marines, after which he had children, three decades in this country, children who are naturalized Americans, grandchildren as well. In the 1990’s this man was convicted of a very small time use of cocaine. He served time in prison here, at the end of which he was deported back to Haiti.

That’s the most significant of all the differences of a legal immigrant to a citizen of this country, and it takes at least five years from the time you become a legal immigrant to the time you might be recognized as a citizen of this country.

This means that legal immigrants spend at least seven years in this country without the right to vote, without the right to sponsor other family members to come as legal immigrants, and with unequal rights under the law. That’s the unjust reality.

I believe that if we address the issue of legal immigration, making it easier, more just, and more sensitive to the needs of those who are coming to this country, we might lessen the amount of illegal immigration. If it were easier to come here, as well as a more favorable experience, we might have fewer people coming as illegal immigrants.

Its time to get creative, and the Hebrew tradition tells some wonderful stories of creative resistance to oppression.

The whole Hebrew story is one of immigration; exile and return.

The Hebrew people were immigrants in Egypt. They fled poverty and oppression. And they lived in Egypt fearing for their lives as people who didn’t have equal rights under the law.

They became so numerous that the Egyptians were worried that they would be outnumbered, so the King issued an edict that every firstborn boy would be killed. Girls would survive.

There is a beautiful story in Exodus 1 about two Hebrew midwives who were ordered by the Egyptian court to ensure that any firstborn males would be killed at birth. The Hebrew midwives suffered a deep crisis of conscious. When it came the first time that a Hebrew boy was born, and they let the boy live, they were called up to the court to explain.

What they said was brilliant. Their answer to the court was that Hebrew women are strong, so strong that they give birth without midwives. They give birth before the midwives even get there. And with a brilliant piece of mother wit, they were able to outwit the Egyptian power elite.

One of the boys was Moses. Moses was put in a basket and placed in the river, while his sister Miriam watched on. And when the Egyptian princess found the Hebrew baby and decided to make him her own, Miriam went to her and said, “I have the perfect woman to care for this child!” and introduced the princess to the mother of Moses. Again, creative problem solving!

The Hebrew tradition includes story after story of creative resistance, of people, women especially, who acted wisely, creatively, and courageously; radical hospitality in the face of enormous odds. And so an Egyptian princess collaborated with a Hebrew mother and what was set in process was a long history of people crossing boundaries, across race, and tribe to work together to create a more inclusive world. The Egyptian princess offered sanctuary to Moses. She refused to be trapped inside an identity that perceived the Hebrew child as someone to be killed to preserve her national identity.

There are some important parallels between what is happening in this country now and what happened in the ancient near east.

Hebrews arrived as economic and political refugees. They soon lost their land tenure and regressed into slavery, quickly became cheap labor, building Egyptian supply cities with few privileges. There are frightening similarities with guest workers in this country.

I want to suggest to you that a way forward in the immigration debate would be three fold.

1. The first would be to recognize that people immigrate from poor countries for a reason. They immigrate because of poverty and oppression, and part of the reason for that poverty and oppression is the action or the inaction of the rest of the world.

America needs to accept at least some responsibility for poverty in Mexico. If America as a country would address poverty in Mexico, there would be fewer illegal immigrants.

Now this is just an opinion, this is arguable, but in my estimation, the NAFTA agreement of the early 90’s has done more harm for Mexico than good. It may have benefited America more than Mexico. It is possible that policies that come out of this country actually increase the level of poverty in Mexico. So the first point is that America needs to recognize its own complicity, at least partly, in the reasons that people illegally immigrate.

2. The second point is that if we can clean up legal immigration and make that process easier and more just, once again we will lessen illegal immigration.

3. Thirdly, I want to propose that we see all people who are legal immigrants in this country as Americans in waiting. If we see legal immigrants as Americans in waiting, then these Americans in waiting should have full voting rights and equal access to the laws and structures of this country.

If we take these steps we may lessen illegal immigration.

Maybe what this country needs is not a longer fence on its border, but rather a statue; a statue that welcomes and celebrates diversity.

This statue would welcome not just new languages, food, and cultures, but it would embrace the hopes and dreams of new arrivals, allowing these visions to shape the national identity.

Just maybe what this country needs is a statue that stands at the borders and welcomes people for their vision and for their passion.

But, wait a minute. We already have that. Her name is Liberty.

jwb1410's picture

Christ is Border Blind

Can you imagine a world without borders; where love rules and the stranger among us is welcomed and invited in? Such a world is a dream of the God I know.

When we build our walls and put up our fences, we keep out blessing and lead with our fear. We are in a mind-frame of scarcity; no loaves and fish miracles happening here!

Do we trust God to provide or not? I know I struggle to believe and that is exactly what we are called to do; to have faith that all is well.

Our rigid boundaries are an outward and visible sign of our inward condition. Christ comes to dissolve our boundaries and all that keeps us from being Love toward one another, especially the stranger.

If Progressive Christians are going to speak out on this issue; it must come from the Heart of God, not the minds of men.

It is easy to dismiss this position as being untenable
and unworkable; which is exactly what was said when it was suggested that slavery should be abolished. It was what was said to the notion that all humans are created equal. It is what is still being said to the idea that a LGBT person should be free to serve in any cleric position within the Church and to have their love unions blessed and legally upheld.

If Christ is to take a stand on this issue, I believe he stands with the stranger and asks us to open our gates.

Stephen Rockwell's picture

immigration issues

Rev. Lawton,

I agree that issues around immigration present a challenge to the conscience of those who pay attention to the scripture which present clear direction for the just and compassionate treatment of immigrants. The dialogue in this country has largely moved away from that.

One small issue I wanted to pick. You said "I want to propose that we see all people who are legal immigrants in this country as Americans in waiting. If we see legal immigrants as Americans in waiting, then these Americans in waiting should have full voting rights and equal access to the laws and structures of this country."

I'm not sure I completely agree with that. I think some sort of process actually makes sense to achieve citizenship with all the rights inherent therein. While the wait time is often too long, I think a process is absolutely needed before we granting the full rights and responsibilities of citizenship, including voting.

Fact is that there are lots of folks who are legal immigrants, but don't have the intention to become citizens. They want to go back to their homeland after a period of time. Citizenship is not desired by the immigrant nor appropriate in this case.

wpeltz's picture

re: immigration issues/voting rights

For the sake of exploratory discussion I'd like to consider the arguments in favor of voting rights for authorized immigrants.

In terms of rights, if people are working and paying taxes they are, in effect, members of their community and their nation. My daughter has lived in England for 20 years, works productively, owns property, pays taxes, has 2 dual-citizenship daughters, and so far has no intention of becoming a British citizen. She votes by absentee ballot in the US, in Illinois, although we left her former home address 10 years ago to move to NY. At this point, she's really a Brit rather than a Yank, in terms of her contribution to either society. She's being taxed there without representation.

There are many people like her here in the US. Perhaps if they had voting input into political decisions at all levels, our political life would be enriched. Our political culture might be more fair, less parochial. And as a matter of fact, in most states they used to have the right to vote.

The last of the alien voting rights laws at the state level ended in 1926, in Arkansas. That law, enacted in 1874 reads: ""Every male citizen of the United States, or male person who has declared his intention of becoming a citizen of the same, of the age of twenty-one years, who has resided in the State twelve months, and in the county six months, and in the voting precinct or ward one month, next preceding any election, where he may propose to vote, shall be entitled to vote at all elections by the people."

Allthough Arkansas had a "declaration of intent" clause, 18 states didn't even require that.

For a quick summary, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_of_foreigners_to_vote_in_the_United_S...

Some other countries do the same: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_of_foreigners_to_vote

The New York City Council currently has before it a Voting Rights Restoration Act. It would allow noncitizen residents 18 years of age or older to vote in New York City municipal elections if they have been lawfully present for six months. Currently, if they have children in school, they have the right to vote in school board elections, as do non-citizens in some other places. However, that idea has been rejected in a few localities and states.

An article that I'm not finished reading indicates that, as of 2003, there were 22 nations in which at least some types of non-citizens had voting rights of some sort: http://www.odu.edu/~dearnest/pdfs/earnest_apsa_2003.pdf

The beginning of that article is a good place to end my comments:

". . . the citizenship qualification carries the aura of inevitability that once attached to the property, race and gender [voter] qualifications.

"As Raskin (1993) suggests in the epigraph, to many observers it seems only natural that citizenship is a prima facie qualification for the right to vote. Yet, like previously 'natural' qualifications for voting such as race, gender or property, states and citizens of democracies across the globe have questioned both the practicality and the morality of limiting the franchise to those who are citizens.

"In an era of large-scale migration, democracies today host populations of aliens that reside within their borders for years—-if not decades or lifetimes—-that pay taxes, face compulsory obligations like the draft, and often share more political interests with their local neighbors than they do with the citizens in their home countries. It is little surprise, then, that in the last four decades governments and citizens have come to embrace voting rights for aliens."

One last word -- granted, fear is at a level that makes it difficult to see how voting rights for non-citizens could be successfully advocated at the national or state level. But at the local, and particularly at the school board level, it could have some traction.

You can find up-to-date information at the Immigrant Voting Project: http://www.immigrantvoting.org/

Jim Ramelis's picture

It Can Be Tough Being an Immigrant

I was raised by an adopted father who was a European immigrant who came from Europe. I lived with him from the time I was 5 until I was 18.

He was a Socialist and started going to one of the Socialist party meetings in Detroit in the late fifties. There were at least 2 of them and maybe 3 or 4. He went to the party meetings of the one that was the most anti-Soviet and anti-communist and pro-Democracy. He was a Democratic Socialist, which is a philosophy that even today, Americans cannot grasp. He found out that some of the party's members were being deported if they were immigrants. This frightened him and blew his mind. He really thought he was in the land of democracy and freedom. He quickly found out that we have plenty of political freedom as long as one is a Democrat or a Republican. Step out of either one of those molds and one may be asking for trouble, especially if they are an immigrant. He came from a country that was then behind the Iron Curtain and if he were deported, it could mean a death sentence, as he was an anti Communist activist back in the old days. When faced with the prospect of deportation, he quickly became an ex-Socialist.

For immigrants today, especially after 9/11, is it any different? May God look after some of the Middle Eastern and Asian immigrants if they do anything political other than jump up and down and wave the flag. If they were deported many of them would be facing execution, like my adopted father. This country also has a long history of deporting and imprisoning immigrants who raise their voice or do labor organizing. I was happy to see the immigration parades last year. Good to see Immigrants flexing a little muscle. There is power in numbers.