Action Alert: So Who Would Still Bomb Iran?
You've made your position clear
Now find out what the candidates are saying
Click here to see the presidential candidate's responses on Iran.
"All options are on the table." That's what we were hearing from most of the presidential candidates about Iran. Everything changed, however, after the latest Nation Intelligence Estimate was released and we learned that Iran had actually stopped its nuclear weapons program in 2003.
So thousands of TrueMajorityAction members signed a petition and demanded that the candidates who said that 'all options' were on the table 'take it back'. Well, we've sent the petitions and personally called the campaigns -- giving them a week to respond. Here's what we heard...
Click here to find out what the presidential candidates had to say about Iran after the NIE report.
On January 3rd, the process for picking our next nominees gets started. And by February 6th, we'll probably have a pretty good idea who the nominees are going to be from both parties. We now know that war with Iran would not only be disastrous, but unnecessary. Thanks to folks like you, the presidential candidates have been reminded of that fact too.
Keep up the good work,
Darcy Scott Martin
TrueMajorityAction.org Washington Director
- Stephen Rockwell's blog
- Login or register to post comments











