Christ’s teachings of nonviolent resistance

Jesus Christ taught and practiced nonviolent resistance. In a time of oppression, as Jesus and fellow Jews experienced, nonviolent resistance takes on a heightened importance, and peacemaking becomes more than an art.

While speaking to a hillside crowd Jesus proclaimed, “Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called children of God.” The speech Jesus gave came to be called the “Sermon on the Mount.” Going beyond mere appeals to his listeners to live in peace, he told them to go out and make peace. Much of his audience were not expecting a Messiah who extolled the virtues of peacemaking, but one who led the Jewish people in violent and triumphant revolt against their Roman occupiers.

Later in the Sermon on the Mount Jesus laid out three ways his audience could nonviolently resist both their Roman occupiers and the Jewish religious leaders. The phrase “turn the other cheek” is famous, but almost always taken out of its cultural context. Jesus said, “But if anyone strikes you on the right cheek, turn the other also.” In ancient Jewish culture the left hand was considered unclean, therefore it was used to perform “unclean tasks,” such as cleaning one’s self. There was such a strong taboo against using the left hand for “clean tasks” that at a religious community in Qumran during Jesus’ time gesturing with the left hand would have “meant exclusion and penance for ten days,” according to theologian Walter Wink.

Note that Jesus mentioned the right cheek being struck. In order to hit someone on the right side of the face with your left hand you must back hand the other person. Masters backhanded their slaves, husbands their wives, parents their children, and the Romans backhanded Jews. In other words, a superior backhanded an inferior. Equals hit each other with their fists. What Jesus’ audience understood him to say was, “If someone backhands you, turn the other cheek so they can’t backhand you again.” It is impossible for someone to backhand a person on the left side of their face with the right hand.

Jesus did not stop with his instruction to resist being backhanded. Jesus told his audience, “If anyone wants to sue you and take your coat, give your cloak as well.” The setting is a law court where a creditor is suing a poor man over an unpaid loan. Only the poorest people were treated in such a manner. According to Jewish law a creditor could take a person’s outer robe as collateral, but each night had to return it for the poor man to sleep in. By telling his audience to take off their cloak in addition to their outer robe, if they are taken to court over an unpaid loan, he is instructing them to take off all their clothes.
Ancient Judaism had a strong taboo against nakedness, but the shame of nakedness would have fallen on the person who caused it in Jesus’ example.

Jesus gave one more instruction on nonviolent resistance. “If someone forces you to go one mile, go also the second mile,” he said. Roman soldiers forced Jews to carry their equipment, but by law only for one mile. A Roman soldier could get in trouble with their centurion (military commander) and be flogged. The Roman solider would have been put in a position of begging the Jewish person to give his equipment back. Therefore, Jesus was instructing his audience to take the initiative against their oppressors, and recover their dignity.

In the words of Wink, when whole crowds “begin behaving thus (and Jesus was addressing a crowd), you have a social revolution on your hands.” Hence the reason both the religious leaders called for his execution and the Roman occupiers crucified him on a cross. Nonviolent resistance was and is dangerous to the powers that be.

0
Your rating: None
Stephen Rockwell's picture

input format

you can change input format with link under textbox. make sure input format is set to full html.

xiananarchist's picture

Indent

I used the indent feature in rich text.

xiananarchist's picture

Alas! The Dreaded Page 82!

Wink is great!  When I read Jesus and Nonviolence, I was giddy. 

But then, I reached the dreaded “page 82.”  It messed me up.  I’m a rabid pacifist, confident in his way.  And for those pacifists out there like myself, a little theological criticism is good for us. 

From Walter Wink’s Jesus and Nonviolence: A Third Way, pp. 82-82:

Much as I fantasize about violence toward my enemies, I cannot conceive of actually killing them.  Yet even if I am committed to nonviolence, I may find myself in a situation where I am not able to find a creative, third way, and must choose between the lesser of two violences, two guilts.  Even then, however, it is not a question of justifying the violence.  I simply must, as Bonhoeffer did, take on myself the guilt and cast myself on the mercy of God.  But in a situation of extreme oppression, it is far better that we act violently than let our fear of sin and guilt paralyze us into no act at all.  I cannot even be sure that my nonviolent acts are just, or right, or willed by God.

Nor can we condemn those who in desperation resort to counter-violence against the massive violence of an unjust order.  We should not strike a neutral pose, says John Swomley, but side with the oppressed, even if they follow the bad example of their oppressors in resorting to violence.    “Violence is not an absolute evil to be avoided at all costs.  It is not even the main problem, but only the presenting symptom of an unjust society.  And peace is not the highest good; it is rather the outcome of a just social order.   

*******************

The question that haunts me: "Into what is Christianity evolving?"

xiananarchist's picture

It didn't work?

I wonder why the blockquote didn't work. I used the indent feature. Can someone look into this?