Anti-femigay website legalizerape.org needs banished

Submitted by dylquesne on Sat, 03/01/2008 - 10:52

I don't know what search engine pointed me to this reprehensible website, do search engines have any control over the sites they list? If so, this site must not be seen by anyone and must be purged from all the search engines results.

www.legalizerape.org seems to be put together by a group advocating for the legalization of rape. It's anti-woman (the webmaster refers to any woman as "Strongwoman," as if they're trying to compromise the integrity of our strength.

It is also anti-gay, calling gay men "masculivoids" or simply gay "men," as if they're ridiculing gays' gender-identities.

I'm just trying to form a group to rid the web of this hateful speech. Please help by getting in touch at nowim33@aol.com.

Bookmark/Search this post with:
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Magnoliacom
  • Newsvine
  • Furl
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Yahoo
  • Technorati
0
Your rating: None
»
  • dylquesne's blog
  • Login or register to post comments
thejanet's picture

from your lips to God's ears

Submitted by thejanet on Sun, 03/02/2008 - 05:27.

Or at least that would be one theory, when I went to look, the side looks like it's been taken down, lock, stock and barrel.

From your description, it sounds pretty offensive. Okay, VERY offensive. I just don't have it in me to ask for a banning of anything, though.

This comes, not just from my normal conflict avoidance mode, but from my strong belief that these nasties shouldn't be allowed to stay under rocks. They BREED under there, I swear they do. I think it's better to put these reprehensible things in strong sunlight, with lots and lots of exposure. Nothing kills evil faster than having lots and lots of people come by to laugh and point and post ridicule. Besides, it's so much fun, and I'm scared of going under rocks in the shadows, who knows what kind of conspiracy nut cootie I might catch!!

Just my opinion, though. Others may prefer other methods (including censorship), let's wait until we hear more opposing viewpoints.

rungavagairun's picture

Dittos

Submitted by rungavagairun on Sun, 03/02/2008 - 20:10.

I feel the same way about this matter as Janet. As much as I think that the site is or was in extreme distaste, I think that censoring them is the wrong solution. In some cases broad renunciation and/or rejection is enough to shoot down an idea and prevent it from spreading.
David