Biblical Economics

As significant as economic results and historical analysis might be, as Christians, I believe we have deeper commitments that economic practice must reflect. The perhaps unexamined assumption behind much Christian economic discuss is that the primary purpose of an economic system is to produce an abundance of consumer goods. But what should the goal of an economic system be if we are to fulfill Christ's call to solidarity?
Here is a passage from Rerum Novarum (Catholic social encyclical by Pope Leo XIII) which is directly relevant to Kristof's (The Socialist Christian) Walmart example: "Let the working man and the employer make free agreements, and in particular let them agree freely as to the wages; nevertheless, there underlies a dictate of natural justice more imperious and ancient than any bargain between man and man, namely, that wages ought not to be insufficient to support a frugal and well-behaved wage-earner. If through necessity or fear of a worse evil the workman accept harder conditions because an employer or contractor will afford him no better, he is made the victim of force and injustice." What is this "dictate of natural justice more imperious and ancient than any bargain between man and man"? It is the Christian principle found in hundreds of Biblical passages, but which might be summarized in this passage, "Do not rob the poor because he is poor, or crush the afflicted at the gate; for the Lord will plead their cause and despoil of life those who despoil them." (Prov. 22: 22 - 23). The implication of the encyclical passage is that it is the act whereby the employer keeps for himself a disproportionate share of the income of the business that is the root of the injustice. The further implication is that these workers are being permanently robbed with the support and approval of the prevailing legal system, of what is their due by natural right.
The Biblical principle on which this is based is that to give alms to the poor is to do justice. Note that this does not mean that charity is an extra good deed above and beyond what is necessary for salvation, but that charity is what is owed to the poor. A further implication is that justice does not simply mean paying just wages and providing benefits, the minimal definition of economic humanity, but that it must include an essential ingredient of generosity, the sharing of superfluous goods. Billionaires are not morally neutral according to Biblical teachings.
The Fathers of the Church were particularly passionate about this teaching. Jerome comments in this way about Luke 16:9 (And I say to you, make friends for yourselves by means of the wealth of unrighteousness, so that when it fails, they will receive you into the eternal dwellings.): "And he very rightly said, "money of injustice", for all riches come from injustice. Unless one person has lost, another cannot find. Therefore I believe that the popular proverb is very true: 'The rich person is either an unjust person or the heir of one.'" Jerome: Carta 120 (PL 22, col 984). Many other such passages could be cited. For instance, Augustine describes the common destiny of goods as follows: "God willed that this earth should be the common possession of all and he offered its fruits to all. But avarice distributed the rights of possession." Augustine, De Trinitate, PL 42, col. 1046.
In order to confirm that this is not merely a superseded teaching, here is what the most current version of the Catholic Catechism says, "The right to private property, acquired by work or received from others by inheritance or gift, does not do away with the original gift of the earth to the whole of mankind. The universal destination of goods remains primordial, even if the promotion of the common good requires respect for the right to private property and its exercise." Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2403.
Traditional Christian teaching contains a profound economic analysis which argues that superfluous economic goods are a direct offense against the poor and a fundamental violation of God's justice. If you would like to see these principles applied to current issues of peace and justice, you might like to take a look at the Nonviolent Jesus blog (http://nonviolentjesus.blogspot.com).
- collinsbo's blog
- Login or register to post comments

Comments
Best of Luck to you, Angelo
Thanks for your generous comments, Angelo. I plan to expand on these comments in my next post. With your permission, I'd like to use your comments on capitalism as my starting point because they state well what I think many Christians accept concerning the current economic system. Also, best of luck to you on your upcoming exhibit!
Thanks Kety and Bo
Thanks Kety and Bo for your wishes. And Bo, I don't mind it if you use my comments, so long as it's put in context. I agree with the criticisms you and Bill have of capitalism's flaws.
After my reception on September 6, I'll have time to post again.
Charity
In the old tradition of KJV language, "Faith, Hope, and Charity, and the greatest of these is Charity"... we learn that our attitude in relationship to economics is justice. Justice which is built on an acknowledgment of the poor, a love for those who need the help we can provide. Sadly today, charity is confused with simple giving of gifts, many times with sting attached, and provides more relief from the guilt of the oppressors than relief to the oppressed. Thank you for your raising an important issue
Thank you.
You are wonderful. Thank you.
Good luck on your show Angelo!
Please let us know how it goes.
Thanks for Talking About Catholic Social Thinking
Hi Bo
Thanks for writing this blog enunciating some specific values of Catholic Social Thinking and their applicability to Progressive Christian Thought. I think that you and Frank are making a good contribution to the pool of progressive Christian ideas that Crossleft members can draw upon. Though I disagree with you about the ability of capitalism to be reformed, you offer good insights and I respect the goals that you put forth about working towards a more humane economic system. Keep writing.
I wrote a post on the papal encyclicals as part of a discussion a few months ago on global poverty(http://www.crossleft.org/node/5915). Though I'm no longer Catholic I respect the papal encyclicals. With your background, you probably have more insight into the encyclicals than I do. I read the encyclicals on my own, so my own understanding may be a bit more eccentric. Maybe you should take the time to write something specifically on Rerum Novarum for nonCatholics who may not be familiar with Catholic Social theory.
I keep telling myself that I won't blog this month so I could have more time to paint for my art show. But you and Bill are posting on something that I have definite opinions on. Thanks for posting on such an interesting subject. I'm wondering if someone could do a blog on the Social Gospels or any new Protestant or Evangelical thinkings on poverty that could be companion pieces to Bo's and Frank's posts on Catholic Social Thinking. What is the range of progressive Christian thought on poverty that Quakers or Episcopalians or other groups may have?
Angelo
P.S I'll try to show discipline and paint and not blog for August. Wish me luck on my show.