The Goal of Christian Economics

As Christians, we should target our economic vision using the fundamental truths revealed to us by the Bible, the saints and Fathers of the Church. St. Thomas Aquinas has shown us that the goal of a society should to create a field of virtue in which its members can pursue their salvation in solidarity. Well-being arises from two factors according to St. Thomas: "For the well-being of the individual two things are necessary: the first and most essential is to act virtuously (it is through virtue, in fact, that we live a good life); the other, and secondary, requirement is rather a means, and lies in a sufficiency of material goods, such as are necessary to virtuous action." St. Thomas Aquinas, De Regimine Principum, chap. XV. From this we see that the goal of economics is to provide sufficient material goods to form the basis for the life of virtue. Rather than making security or survival or constant expansion of material goods the goal of economic policy, Christian economics must be centered in promoting the exercise of those virtues which lead to salvation.

Today we see the beginnings of such a society growing in Venezuela. The Bolivarian Revolution is rapidly eliminating the raging poverty which the Venezuelan people have long suffered despite the oil wealth of their country, but beyond that it aims at creating an economic system consistent with the highest standards of human dignity.

Hugo Chavez, the leader of this revolution, is a genuine follower of Jesus Christ. He has put into practice the words of Jeremiah, "Woe to him who builds his house on wrong, his terraces on injustice; Who works his neighbor without pay, and gives him no wages. Who says, 'I will build myself a spacious house, with airy rooms,' Who cuts out windows for it, panels it with cedar, and paints it with vermilion. Must you prove your rank among kings by competing with them in cedar? Did not your father eat and drink? He did what was right and just, and it went well with him. Because he dispensed justice to the weak and the poor, it went well with him. Is this not true knowledge of me? says the LORD." (Jer. 22: 13 - 16)

True knowledge of God, according to Jeremiah, is to dispense justice to the needy and poor. Chavez has put love into action by reducing poverty by 38%, lifting up those who would never have had the slightest chance of education or real health care under the brutal oligarchy which flourished by the patronage of U.S. oil companies and is so desperate for the return of its unjust privileges.

A brief examination of the Bolivarian constitution shows that "human development" or what Aquinas would have called "the pursuit of virtue" must take precedence over profit: "In the 1999 constitution, Article 299, for example, emphasizes 'human development' as the cornerstone of social judgments and Article 70 states that the 'involvement of people in the exercise of their social and economic affairs should be manifest through citizen service organs, self-management, co-management, cooperatives in all forms, community enterprises, as well as other kinds of associations guided by the values of mutual cooperation and solidarity.'" - Michael Albert, "Which Way Venezuela?"

In other words, the development of the human person, through participation in collective decision-making, exercising mature social judgement, and learning cooperation through mutual support and empathy is the basis for the new society now blooming across the sea. In this way, the virtue of Christian solidarity is born through actual practice, through recognition of the dignity and capacity for of each person in collective action for the good of the whole. This new path is a stark contrast to the passive despair and brutalization that reigned where U.S. corporate interests dominate.

These beautiful goals have been accompanied by programs which have truly raised people from rampant poverty, unlike the trickle-down theories that have made poverty permanent wherever they were tried. What we see in Venezuela today are cooperative ventures incarnated in new social formations: "Another innovative feature of the Bolivarian project - or revolution - depending on your opinion - are the Socialist Production Units. These 'are companies run by the government and marked by extensive community involvement. UPS's are found predominantly in the agricultural sector, and they promote national agricultural sovereignty. Part of the profits of these companies is invested into community projects, which are identified jointly with local community leaders. In the long term, UPS's will ideally be handed over directly to the community and run as community enterprises.'" - Michael Albert, "Which Way Venezuela?"

Note that profits are made to be invested in community projects. Profits are shared in a way that builds community, that is aimed toward cultivating common interests. Such an economy does not condemn profits, but subordinates them to the good of the entire collective, rather than making them a goal unto themselves.

These are down-to-earth realizations of what I referred to in an earlier posting when I spoke about the difference between an economy that promotes solidarity and one which is based on creating divisions. The owners of capital in our U.S. economy profit more and get higher stock prices for their companies if 1) workers get less pay; 2) workers get fewer benefits; 3) workers work more intensely with less time off; and 4) workers are organizationally weak. These observations are not theories or the result of some emotional animosity to competition, but objective facts. Whether you are a buccaneer capitalist or a pacifist anarchist, these facts are widely admitted.

It is equally clear that such an economic system works directly against the Christian virtue of solidarity. Our primary social duty as Christians is to care for others, and grow in compassion. This growth in virtue can be fostered only by an economic system that vigorously rewards shared interests and common aspirations toward justice and equality. The current U.S. economic system not only works against solidarity, but makes those who obey their conscience less competitive.

Christian economics creates modes of production, allocation, and consumption that enhance ties among people. The Law of Reciprocity in economics means that in order for me to do well, I have to be concerned with helping others to do well. As I seek my benefits, economic forces pull me toward finding benefits for others. Fostering empathy and fellow feeling is the goal of a Christian economy, not efficiency, survival, security or any of the other idols of the capitalist economy. As Jesus proclaimed, "Seek ye first the kingdom of heaven and all these things will be added unto you."

"Capitalism is the way of the devil and exploitation. If you really want to look at things through the eyes of Jesus Christ — who I think was the first socialist — only socialism can really create a genuine society." - Hugo Chavez

0
Your rating: None

alternative energy sources

Jim, I think you are spot on as it relates to Venezuelan oil. I think that's why it's so important for us to be looking towards alternative energy sources. Sadly, while we remain dependant on oil, these dynamics are prone to persist.

Hugo does his best to anger Bush

I think Hugo has done a tremendous job in Venezuela. I've been a fan for some time. He's had several attempts made on his life. And it didn't help that Pat Robertson instructed his 700 Club watchers to assassinate him (how anyone can believe he's a xtian when he suggests murder is beyond me). And for a dictatorship the people sure feel confident enough to have large, 100 or 200 thousand strong, protests in front of the presidential home. Try to get that many Americans out for a protest to improve labor, education, health care, etc. So if our government is right and he's a terrible dictator, he sure is a lousy one at controlling his people.

I think Hugo is sincere. But power does have a tendency to corrupt. I hope he'll step down before that happens. I do worry a bit about our friends down there. Much of the money we spend on the "drug war" has gone to building up and arming guerrilla groups along the Colombian/Venezuelan border. Last year Hugo signed a contract with Iran to allow it to put four oil platforms off the Venezuelan shore. Hugo loves snubbing the Bushies.

It's good to keep an eye on that situation. Bush et al may think all Americans are focused on Iraq and try to pull some sneaky business down there.

I often wonder if that's not why we (Americans that believe the FOX network - not us specifically) loathe France so much - their government provides universal healthcare, help for single moms, free childcare for working moms, lots of time off after a birth for both parents (up to a year for moms), education fully paid through college, and so many other family friendly policies and policies to help the poor. They are not strapped with the enormous debt that we are. I feel like in America we just slaves to corporate rulers. We work for them and then give our money right back to them. I suspect I govmt might worry that if we got to know the French too well, we may just demand to have the good life that they have.

Capitalism isn't entirely bad. Even Hugo is using some ideas of capitalism. But when we gave reign to corporations by allowing them all the rights of an individual with no time limitation we destroyed capitalism. Our founding fathers were clear that corporations were only for a short term solution for building roads, railroads and bridges, civil projects to make lives easier. Upon completion of the project (or a predetermined timeframe) the corporation was to be dissolved. And back then they did not have the rights of an individual without any responsibility for wrongdoing.

I'm not sure how the world will reel this monster back in, I just hope we find the answer soon and that it's a nonviolent one.

Stephen Rockwell's picture

Hugo is no saint

As I've mentioned on this site before, Hugo is no saint. Despite the Carter center mysteriously signing off on the last elections, there were a number of significant issues. While he is to be applauded for public policy supporting the poor, his support of democracy is questionable at best.

France a Christian Nation?

& that is why I love France... :-)

"I often wonder if that's not why we (Americans that believe the FOX network - not us specifically) loathe France so much - their government provides universal healthcare, help for single moms, free childcare for working moms, lots of time off after a birth for both parents (up to a year for moms), education fully paid through college, and so many other family friendly policies and policies to help the poor. They are not strapped with the enormous debt that we are. I feel like in America we just slaves to corporate rulers. We work for them and then give our money right back to them. I suspect I govmt might worry that if we got to know the French too well, we may just demand to have the good life that they have."

--tshofner

100 to 200 thousand strong protests

This isan excellent post. Thank you. I especially appreciate your point about the 100 to 200 thousand strong protest. I had no idea. It certainly makes your point. (& gives us something to strive for :-) )

collinsbo's picture

Good Observations

There are several good observations here, particularly the idea that allowing corporations all the rights of an individual led to its worst excesses. I agree with this idea, but I think it must be pushed much further. And I think it needs to be based on the social and political concepts of Jesus Christ. I'll be publishing a couple of new posts to summarize these ideas.

corporations are not people

& it is eggregious that they be recognized as such.

Christian economics

Richard,
Very thought provoking post. If a person lives by the Golden Rule, truly embraces in it's fullest implicatons the Ethic of Reciprocity, then they will live a virtuous life. As I recall the little I know of Buddhism, this its the Buddha's main challenge, to live to virtuous life.

By living by the principle of the Ethic of Reciprocity a person need not be "religious", not need to follow the tenants of any particular spiritual path, but simply live a virtuous life out of a desire to live a life based on the intellectual notion of enlightened self interest. A person can use reason to argue that it's in my self
interest to see that the needs of others are met as I fulfill my needs.

That's why I argue for enlightened Christian economic policies based on the GR/EOR, it fulfills an ancient principle embraced by the major world religions simultaneously appealing to the non-religious. Here we can unite the majority of the world's believers in a higher power, persons of faith, with the Agnostic and the Atheist, the secularist intellectual, persons primarily of reason.

Faith and reason, the two primary powers Our Creator empowered human being with. These two birthright gifts are what sets us apart from the lesser developed primates. Reason demands we use our Creator given free will responsibly. The challenge in any policy paper will be to clearly show the super rich how their best interests are tied to that of the poor, how we are intimately interconnected, interactive and interdependent one one another, each and every human being, how we must protect our global home from pollution, to share natures bounty of resources to the benefit of the whole of the huamn family.

I hope that this is what Hugo Chavez understands, is from where he comes. His recent attempts to become president for life makes me question that though. I think the people of Venezuela, by their vote, just reminded Mr. Chavez how interdependent he is on their good will, freely expressed. I don't agree that Jesus was the first socialist though. I don't think Jesus was that concerned about life on the physical plane. He understood that of you have your spiriutal life right, the other 3 planes are well taken care of.

Let us discuss this more fully next Monday night during our Theology group discussions.

Rich

collinsbo's picture

Ethics of Reciprocity

Thanks for your thoughtful comments, Rich. However, my main argument is not based on the personal character of Hugo Chavez at all.

My main argument is summarized by St. Thomas Aquinas: "For the well-being of the individual two things are necessary: the first and most essential is to act virtuously (it is through virtue, in fact, that we live a good life); the other, and secondary, requirement is rather a means, and lies in a sufficiency of material goods, such as are necessary to virtuous action." St. Thomas Aquinas, De Regimine Principum, chap. XV.

This seems to me to be a useful starting point for thinking about economics from a Christian viewpoint. The purpose of our life on this earth is to attain union with God. Whatever aids that union is the good that we must aim at. St. Thomas shows that well-being primarily requires that we act virtuously. Economics creates the conditions for that virtuous action in his view. Whereas we usually think that economics is about producing and distributing goods, I think we need to take a step back and think as Christians. As Christians, we want to create conditions that lead to the flourishing of virtue. The primary virtue that we must obey is characterized by you as the Ethic of Reciprocity, which Leviticus describes as follows: "You shall not oppress your neighbor...but you shall love your neighbor as yourself. I am the Lord." (Lev. 19: 13, 18)

Hugo Chavez' policies have helped create these conditions in Venezuela by improving the lives of the poor materially, by making education and health care widely available, and by giving the poorest Venezuelan a sense of dignity and participation in the life of his country which was totally lacking under the previous oligarchy.

I'd be very interested in your understanding of the idea that economics should produce a system that draws us in the direction of solidarity and cooperation such as we see in Venezuela rather than the conflicting interests promoted by capitalism.

I also think that Jesus Christ was quite interested in life on the physical plane. He was quite clear that the Kingdom of heaven was earthly as well as spirtual, but that's a topic for another post.

Thanks again for your insightful reply.

Jim Ramelis's picture

Hugo Chavez and Christianity

Although he is no saint, I think Hugo Chavez has gotten a bad rap in the American press. This may be in large part to the fact that Venezuela has oil and one day the U. S. may want to knock them over them head and take their oil, as we are now doing to Iraq. We can't of course say that is what we are going to do so it will have to be about liberating the Venezuela people from the evil tyrant, Hugo.
Everything I have heard or read says that Chavez has made huge progress in elevating the status of the poor. He is getting some of that oil money to the people in the form of food, education, and housing. We don't like that and want that oil money going to the oil multi-nationals. So Hugo has to be vilified by the corporate media.
Capitalism, as we know it, is not for everyone. It just hasn't worked in places like Latin America and this new ruthless Milton Friedman style of unchecked, profit before all, privatize everything, help the rich and everything will fall into place as the wealth trickles down, brand of capitalism, is good for no one.
I hope Chavez's faith is sincere. I also hope he doesn’t try and become President for Life or a dictator.