Just War, Pre-emptive War and basic Christian Values

If America is truly the "Christian Nation" the Neo-conservatives claim it is, and if Sen. Obama is the good Christain he claims to be then here is a opportunity for him to show it.

From Matthew 5:38 & 39
"You have heard it said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth" 38
"But I say to you that you should not resist evil; but whoever strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also." 39

Note that the phase "turn your cheek" is an Aramaic idiom meaning, "Do not start a quarrel or a fight."

At the beginning of the 4th century C.E. the Roman Empire collapsed, Rome was sacked in 409. It was at this time that the writings of Augustine of Hippo advanced the concept of "just war." He advocated the use of force against the Donatists, who did not believe the church should be involved in the secular affairs of government, as he, Augustine, believed. Given the catastophic effects of the break up of the mighty Roman Empire, with all it's violence and social upheaval, combined with the struggles for theological prominence amongst the early church fathers, and you can see the context in which Augustine wrote.

Just 4 centuries after Jesus left this earthly plane, one of his most basic teachings was thus countermanded.

With this backdrop in mind then, in this concept we can see a possible theological basis, in Augustine's writings, for the Bush Administration's concept of "pre-emptive war."

However, as Jesus commanded us to "turn the other cheek" i.e. not to start a quarrel or a fight, then the unprovoked invasion of Iraq was a violation of a basic Christian tenet and is thus unChristian and therefore immoral.

If Sen. Obama advances this idea, he'll help correct this nation's errant path. IMO, this could have been his coup de grace in last Friday's 1st Presidential Bebate. Diplomacy should always trump force. Bush blew a perfect opportunity to show the world Christian grace after the 9/11 attacks, to resist the calls for revenge, had he this understanding of the teachings, the basic tenets, of Jesus' ministry.

0
Your rating: None
Culture Dove's picture

Raising the bar

Matthew 5 is impossible to live out! Jesus raises the bar so high that only grace can get us through. "You have heard that it was said....BUT I say to you...." Jesus won't even let us call someone a moron without being guilty of murdering that person! The only remotely sane explanation of how Christians can support war in light of this teaching is that these directions were for individuals and don't apply to the state. It might be worth discussing that divide, but personally I don't buy it, particularly in a democracy where I am obliged to work for a majority so that my view can be represented.

Pacifism is a tough sell and will never carry the day as long as powerful interests hold sway. And in this case, the powerful interests aren't the usual suspects of lust and greed, but the even more basic desire for self-preservation. Augustine sold us out and it has been a long slide downhill since then.

That being said, Obama could at least take the high road and draw a line that precludes pre-emption. That, at least, would be a move toward a more Christian foreign policy...and he shouldn't hesitate to use that precise language.

A high bar indeed!

Rev. Ian,
Yes, the bar Jesus set is high, deliberately high, so as to pull us up out of our comfortable self indulgent shells. Jesus came here not only to comfort the afflicted but also to inflict the comfortable. Only grace will save us? Perhaps. I certainly can relate to that. I've come close to death several times yet I am still here. Is this grace, hard working guardian angels or just feline DNA in my blood?

Pelagius argued that mankind can avoid sinning, that we are free to obey or not obey God's commandments, that we must take responsiblity for whatever choices we make. If we are saved by grace alone we become lax in our attention to principles, leaving it to God to protect us. He tried to elevate mankind to a higher level, to demand we all take greater responsibility for our individual actions. This is why I am attracted to his teachings.

I'm big on individual free will and responsibility. That's what is happening now on Wall St. and Main St. You can't go about exploiting the hard earned savings of others w/o expecting them to demand you do so responsibly. Similarly individual investors and people who take out a mortgage must be aware of the risks involved. It's a case of mutual responsiblity. I don't place all the responsiblity for our current financial mess soley on Wall St. Main St. willingly went alone, heard the piper pipe a tune of easy money and now the piper demands his due.

The stock market runs largely on faith. Lose it and the markets fall and we all get hurt. Economically the whole world is now intimately interconnected, interactive and interdependent. Long gone is the morally lax isolationist "we can go it alone" philospohy. All nations need one another.

This is the moral lesson our leaders have failed to learn and now our position is the world greatly diminished. We simply can not go about exploiting the riches of others for our own selfish gain w/o expecting a powerful push back.

My hope is that Sen. Obama is elected, and that he can successfully restore our inner moral bearings and elevate our position globally.

Turn the other cheek i.e. do not start quarrels; actually live by the golden rule, the ethic of reciprocity. High ideals, yes, but not impossible to attain. This is the calling Jesus issues to each of us. Use your birthright free will responsibly.

BTW it's good to hear your insights here again. Welcome back. Please join us Monday the 19th on our next Theology Panel discussion. Our new panel convenor, Rev. Roger McClellan knows well how to challenge us, get us out of our comfort zone.

Rich

St. Augustine & Preemptive War

Rich I have to disagree with this statement:

With this backdrop in mind then, in this concept we can see a possible theological basis, in Augustine's writings, for the Bush Administration's concept of "pre-emptive war."

St. Augustine justified war only if the ultimate reason is for love. Clearly, ending aggression that is either Nazi or Stalinist is thus justified. But with that said, Iraq is not so justified since it is based on either projecting U.S. military power (Rumsfeld-Cheney hardline conservatism) or to bring about an American empire (neoconservatism).

Just War

Frank,
If you read the whole 5th chapter of Matthew, you'll see the overall theme is forgiveness and reconcilation. It begins with the Beatitudes and continues with the Sermon on the Mount. Had George W. Bush had this as his spiritual anchor he would not have squandered the good will we had immediately after the 9/11 attack.

You've raised this point before, that war in self defense is justified. On the surface that's emotionally an understandable position. I certainly would not hestitate to use force, lethal if neccessary, to defend my wife's life. Thus we chose to live in quiet cul-de-sac, in an community that knows who belongs here and who doesn't. We know the world can be a dangerous place, so we take common sense measures to increase our safety.

As Jesus asked us to love one another as He loved us, we should never put ourselves into a position that justifies aggression by another.

Moreover I do not accept Augustine's position that war can justified if the ultimate reason is for love. War and love are mutually exclusive. To kill another, a person must muster enough hate to overcome their basic instinct to live and let live. I sincerely believe, in the very depths of my soul, that humans are by nature loving creatures. We are told in the Bible we are created in the image and spirit of God. I believe God, Our Creator, is a loving entity, one that seeks to have us prosper and enjoy our existence, to multiply and be fruitful.

The 9/11 attacks came from our inablity, or lack of desire, to understand the history and long term implications of our middle east policies, especially our oil interests. The 1979 Iranian revolt had its roots in the British oil industry dating back into the late 19th century. The most immediate cause was Eisenhower's decision to back an uprising, engineered by the CIA in 1953, to overthrow the newly elected leader of the Iranian parliment, who sought a fair share for his nation in exploitation of Iranian oil resources. The result was the restoration of the monarchy, which under the new younger Shah, was quite brutal in it's treatment of the opposition. Young Shah Pahlavi understood that if he was to institute real reforms, he had to break the power of the religious establishment. He did so by instituting radical land reform that confiscated the lands of Iran's religious leaders, their source of wealth.

Their resentment of the land reforms and what appeared to be the embrace of foreign social values quite contrary to established Iranian norms, greatly angered the religious establishment and set the stage for the 1979 revolt.

As the great Spanish philosopher George Santayana is famously quoted saying, "Those who can not remember the past are condemned to repeat it." If we deliberately ignore the past we fall into the trap of repeating it. We (our government and business leaders) arrogantly ignored the Iranian's desire for an equal share in the oil profits and the social norms of the day. When the British installed the family of Saud in 1932, they extended their control over middle east oil reserves. Thus we, in partnership with the Brits, created fertile ground for the 9/11 attacks. We looked like, and still do, invaders intent on exploiting all middle east oil resources for solely Western nations benefit.

Exercise of our birthright free will requires full acceptance of the consequences of our actions. We helped set the conditions that lead to the 1979 Iran revolt and the 9/11 attacks. Only be acknowledging our role can we free ourselves from future attacks. Sen. Obama has it right. Invoke the power of diplomacy first, reserve force for last.

Rich

Well done Rich!

Thanks Rich for this wonderful piece. You have succinctly presented the biblical Christian perspective on war. Augustine indeed circumvented the teachings of Christ on this essential doctrine.

Gary